The Guilty Plea Discount: Does Pragmatism Win over Proportionality and Principle
نویسنده
چکیده
A discount in sentencing quantum is routinely provided to defendants who plead guilty to offences. This article examines the reasons for such a discount, and argues that there is little appropriate justification; and further that it creates, in effect, a penalty for defendants who exercise their right to trial. It is further argued that the existence of such a discount can provide an inappropriate incentive to enter a guilty plea for defendants who may otherwise have had a valid reason for exercising their right to trial.
منابع مشابه
Is Plea Bargaining in the ‘‘Shadow of the Trial’’ a Mirage?
It has been well established that a ‘‘plea discount’’ or ‘‘trial penalty’’ exists, such that defendants who plead guilty receive significant sentencing discounts relative to what they would receive if convicted at trial. Theorists argue that the exact value of this plea discount is determined by bargaining ‘‘in the shadow of a trial,’’ meaning that plea decision-making is premised on the percei...
متن کاملDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Strategic Voting in a Jury Trial with Plea Bargaining
We study the criminal court process focusing on the interaction between plea bargaining and jury trials. We model plea bargaining such that a prosecutor makes a takeit-or-leave-it offer and a defendant, who is either guilty or innocent, pleads either guilty or not guilty. If the defendant pleads not guilty, the case goes to a jury trial, which follows a strategic voting model. Plea bargaining p...
متن کاملToward a Comparative Economics of Plea Bargaining (with Thomas Miceli)
We attempt to open a path to the comparative analysis of criminal procedure by superimposing the efficiency principle onto an adversarial system characterized by an aversion to false convictions and an inquisitorial system characterized by a desire to justly punish the guilty. We begin with a general model of plea bargaining, embed it in a larger framework that addresses the costs of adjudicati...
متن کاملAn Explicit Test Of Plea Bargaining In The “ Shadow Of The Trial ”
Bargaining in the “shadow of the trial,” which hinges on the expectations of trial outcomes, is the primary theory used by noncriminologists to explain variation in the plea discount given to defendants who plead guilty. This study develops a formal mathematical representation of the theory and then presents an empirical test of the theory using an innovative online survey with responses to a h...
متن کاملPlea Decision-Making By Attorneys And Judges
Objectives Approximately 95 % of convictions in the United States are the result of guilty pleas. Surprisingly little is known about the factors which judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys consider in these decisions. To examine the legal and extralegal factors that legal actors consider in plea decision-making, we replicated and improved upon a 40-year-old study by asking legal actor part...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008